<!-- bryant-content-generator:start --> # The implementation of Atomic Markdown's... > The implementation of Atomic Markdown's publication architecture has changed without changing the architecture itself. AutoSites and WordChirp interpreted the marked corpus in real time: quotation pages, passage pages, posters, indexes, and feed representations could be resolved from the canonical source without requiring the writer to run a separate generation process. My present Obsidian workflow uses a plugin to materialize many of those same projections as files under and . One approach renders derivative objects dynamically and the other generates them ahead of use, but both preserve the governing relationship: the manuscript remains authoritative while every public artifact remains a reproducible projection of it. **Source:** [[projects/The Argument in Miniature - How I Write Quotations, Paragraphs, and Reusable Prose|The Argument in Miniature: How I Write Quotations, Paragraphs, and Reusable Prose]] ## Share on Social Media ``` “The implementation of Atomic Markdown's publication architecture has changed without changing the architecture itself. AutoSites and WordChirp interpreted the marked corpus in real time: quotation pages, passage pages, posters, indexes, and feed representations could be resolved from the canonical source without requiring the writer to run a separate generation process. My present Obsidian workflow uses a plugin to materialize many of those same projections as files under and . One approach renders derivative objects dynamically and the other generates them ahead of use, but both preserve the governing relationship: the manuscript remains authoritative while every public artifact remains a reproducible projection of it.” — Bryant McGill https://bryantmcgill.com/passages/passages-implementation-atomic-markdowns-remains-reproducible-projection ``` <!-- bryant-content-generator:end -->