Center for Autonomy - Bryant McGill

# Center for Autonomy **Entity class:** Concept or analytic term **Domain:** Austin Research / Laboratories **Doc Type:** Research entity **Source basis:** Supplied research cluster with linked references; see the [[wiki/Austin Research Evidence Map|evidence map]] for verification scope. Oden’s **Center for Autonomy** researches control, learning, estimation, game theory, and formal methods for systems acting across land, air, sea, space, and infrastructure environments. It supplies the action branch of the Austin succession stack. The decisive connection is from an inferred state to a chosen action. A model can predict without controlling anything; an autonomous system must choose and execute actions under uncertainty and constraints. [[wiki/Digital Twin|Digital twins]] can support that loop through updated state and forecasts. The center’s research portfolio provides concrete engineering work in this direction. Its relevance to [[wiki/Machine Succession|machine succession]] is an interpretation of the capacities being developed, rather than an asserted institutional succession mission. ## Texas biome position The [[wiki/Computational-Civic Biome|computational-civic biome]] route from [[articles/Pax Silica's Crown Jewel|Pax Silica's Crown Jewel]] places the Center for Autonomy at the action layer of UT Austin's research branch. Its control, estimation, learning, and formal-methods work shows how regional compute and models can become constrained physical action. This is a capability relationship, not evidence that the center is part of Stargate or a coordinated statewide operational system. ## Connected entries [[articles/Pax Silica's Crown Jewel|Pax Silica's Crown Jewel]] · [[wiki/Computational-Civic Biome|Computational-Civic Biome]] · [[wiki/Oden Institute|Oden Institute]] · [[wiki/Operational Autonomy|Operational Autonomy]] · [[wiki/Digital Twin|Digital Twin]] · [[wiki/Control Theory|Control Theory]] · [[wiki/State Estimation|State Estimation]] · [[wiki/Machine Succession|Machine Succession]] · [[wiki/Karen Willcox|Karen Willcox]] ## Simple Reminders, Quotations, and Thoughts > "When I think about the machines that can think, i.e. the AI, I think of them as technology that needs to be developed with similar (if not greater!) care." > **— Jaan Tallinn**, *2015, Edge annual question “What Do You Think About Machines That Think?”* [[reminders/AI Control/AI Must Be Developed With Greater Care by Jaan Tallinn|AI Must Be Developed With Greater Care by Jaan Tallinn]] > "What is scary as hell is the idea an entity possessed of extra-human intelligence and speed and our motivational system—in other words, human beings equipped with access to powerful AI systems." > **— Edward Slingerland**, *2015, Edge annual question “What Do You Think About Machines That Think?”* [[reminders/AI Control/Human Motives Plus Extra-Human Intelligence Are the Real Danger by Edward Slingerland|Human Motives Plus Extra-Human Intelligence Are the Real Danger by Edward Slingerland]] > "I suppose this amounts to a change in the goals of AI: instead of pure intelligence, we need to build intelligence that is provably aligned with human values." > **— Stuart Russell**, *2015, Edge annual question “What Do You Think About Machines That Think?”* [[reminders/AI Control/Intelligence Must Be Provably Aligned With Human Values by Stuart Russell|Intelligence Must Be Provably Aligned With Human Values by Stuart Russell]] > "Machines that think make it possible for more people to celebrate the joy of human intuitive insight, and to cultivate the equanimity that is unique to the self-controlled human mind." > **— Nina Jablonski**, *2015, Edge annual question “What Do You Think About Machines That Think?”* [[reminders/AI Control/Thinking Machines Could Deepen Human Intuition by Nina Jablonski|Thinking Machines Could Deepen Human Intuition by Nina Jablonski]] > "In order to achieve the dream for thinking machines, they will have to understand and question values, suffer internal conflicts, and experience intimacy." > **— Andrés Roemer**, *2015, Edge annual question “What Do You Think About Machines That Think?”* [[reminders/AI Control/Thinking Machines Must Experience Values and Intimacy by Andrés Roemer|Thinking Machines Must Experience Values and Intimacy by Andrés Roemer]] ## Sources and corpus context - [[research/The Austin Executable Loop|The Austin Executable Loop — master document]] - [[research/Oden Institute - The Austin Succession Stack|Oden Institute - The Austin Succession Stack]] - [Center for Autonomy — Oden Institute](https://oden.utexas.edu/research/centers-and-groups/center-for-autonomy/) **Cluster:** [[wiki/Austin Executable Loop|Austin Executable Loop]] · [[wiki/Austin Research Evidence Map|Austin Research Evidence Map]] ## Relationships  This entry's documented connections are expressed in its definition and related-work routes, with provenance retained in the source-linked material.